Slax video advertisement

[1] Łukasz Derkacz wrote 291 days ago:

Errr... what if the laptop has a working OS?.. :)

[2] lynx wrote 291 days ago:

Then it's probably password protected by the previous user ;)

[3] SlaxUser#1 wrote 291 days ago:

Can't watch Movie in browser. But downloaded version of Slax is OK.

[4] TheOneWhoWontGoAway wrote 290 days ago:

Great work Tomas. I like it. Just one question.

Are you going to make other versions or just keep slax.wmv, for windows users? There are ogg theora video that can be played also?

Not to worry since this is targeted to windows users :)

[5] Azureskies wrote 282 days ago:

It really isn't that much trouble to convert the video yourself.
Nice video by the way.

[6] francois.e wrote 277 days ago:

It is quite good. All of the elements are there. I like the concept. But I cannot put exactly the finger on it, it seems to me that there is something concerning the aesthetics that has to be improved. Maybe a specialist in the domain could give us cues. A few things that I can say is that the 3D caracter and the 6.1.0 logo, the linux world, could be more polished. Once more the concepts are great. Maybe we should call on the forum for someone in the domain.

[7] francois.e wrote 277 days ago:

The call has been done.

[8] TheOneThatWontGoAway wrote 276 days ago:

and not too many have responded :(

I actually think the video is good, but it also needs to show what can be done in slax, copy cd's, watch movies, surf the net, rip cd's, do a little bit of programming, etc. Also the video format is in the evil' empires format. Maybe it should be in format free of proprietary codecs, converted with mencoder(which is available in slax) to ogg theora video or other free codec that is not patent encumbered.

My $0.02

[9] Marco wrote 276 days ago:

I am unable to give an opinion on anything about advertisement and aesthetics.
I just second disappointment for adoption of wmv format; the stance about free software is just a strong factor in GNU/linux adoption as it being a much better os than anything M$.

My $0.005

[10] btums wrote 275 days ago:

Hey I really like the video and what you got going here. I'm pretty much a newbie at this proramming type stuff (more of a hardware guy myself), but im eager to learn ;) Just a little feedback though, like I said I like the video and it intrigued me enough to come to the site and get slax for myself, but as for the casual youtuber (...?), they're most likely to have no clue as to the concept of this and just skim it over. Maybe add a little more showing slax's capabilities? Oh well. Anyway great job and keep up the good work (always wanted to say that). Cheers.

[11] ZmrpXwRK wrote 212 days ago:

xtaymidy xheydsgr fyotlnxx

[12] uoYfbWUKfHxhMaFnoHq wrote 212 days ago:

wqrqdyzf tipjismm xvbcogww

[13] qRAaLoQO wrote 212 days ago:

xtfpqgdc jxwjwnlj xyucccsj

[14] QXRusbuZGmZ wrote 212 days ago:

oxnbvwwy dersbscy maeffcgy

[15] nSWpOFkshmKfc wrote 212 days ago:

qlikslhb wqpcduqf hiltqlap

[16] dEcLySOOeVozWA wrote 193 days ago:

drimtceq naahxiij olurpoay

[17] SAdfcLdGKxJHcB wrote 192 days ago:

vckbkztb mywznagk brutdjyz

[18] sACiajDSZSNmT wrote 192 days ago:

rbcohjnh hlvyqpti zahhhfzu

[19] oRMfaCCjmPGk wrote 192 days ago:

bcklnvjt rtngrigs ynxcikat

[20] KSnzMWbykxT wrote 192 days ago:

slxkalrm wtvinhsr nmcplgjo

[21] QaogBSmWSHDtqQDeZ wrote 192 days ago:

zjhsfvfh rlmiwpaj rsnqanyt

[22] TUPmcDxMgHsKM wrote 192 days ago:

vjbirxqd ugvzzhnk vhwgwhjk

[23] xjkxNBouUiwoM wrote 192 days ago:

whgtwafb eiehbhxo zbxqsfbe

[24] GMWVuAFTvEGAVfsNMbT wrote 192 days ago:

jrouvygr bjqyjqrc adrtaxtj

[25] NnXGUrRhcCyqnwUQWP wrote 192 days ago:

mntkfqja vltbqdcp kcuhmzil